Fact, If the treatment that is used at JRC was used out in public, it would be called assault.

I posted this as a comment on https://norfolkcountyamnesty.wordpress.com/2018/05/03/the-judge-rotenberg-center-and-torture

It’s really really sick that this country allows this. I’ve seen this video before. Ive seen most of them. It is extremely cruel especially that they shock them for sh* like stimming (just waving there hand) because they want to eliminate the typical autistic behavior of stimming. Just minor behavior that is not bad or harmful they shock students for. And there is LOP which is another sick twisted horrible torture that they used, probably still do where they take away there prisoners (“students”) right to talk with other students. Its so cruel. It’s incredible that this sadistic viol torture is allowed as an exception, when almost anywhere else this treatment would be punished by imprisonment.

Try to give some one out in public in the street an electric shock for stimming, do it to a random stranger and it is considered assault. Do it to your child and they take your child away. But JRC can do it and the law says JRC gets a free pass. In JRC It’s called “treatment” by the law. Everywhere else it is called “assault”. Makes no sense.

The horrible torture at JRC (Dave’s interview with former JRC student)

Dave posted on his blog Reward and Consent an interview with Anna Kosovskaya about her cruel voile horrible torture they did to her there. I skipped down to the meat of the article (“The Report” section)

This is the very detailed report Dave Altieri interview with Anna Kosovskaya:
https://rewardandconsent.blogspot.pe/2015/06/anna-kosovskaya-escapes-from-judge_11.html

Here is the Facebook post:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/4614812683/permalink/10154904852812684/

This is what I commented about the article on Facebook:
I read the report up to section “JRC behavior control methods” so far. They told a student “there’s no crying without appropriate stimulus”. Wow. You did a good job on this report Dave. This is intense. SMH Very sad.
AND
“another program op I had was for a staff to pinpoint an unfair behavior on me and I had to accept the pinpoint” That’s F–ing SICK! What a horrible thing to teach someone. That’s teaching if you are treated unfairly you should accept it. That is so WRONG!
AND
I skipped down for now to LOP (Loss Of Privileges). This I think is more cruel then getting a shock for misbehaving way more cruel. It’s hard for me to come up with words to say how cruel I think LOP is. I wonder if they still do this hideous thing. “when you are on LOP, you can’t do anything, not even speak to anyone”. That is SICK. That is so cruel!!!
AND
This is what the evil viol cruel people at JRC subjected Anna to the horrible cruel LOP for: getting out of bed w/o permission: “my first day I broke for getting out of bed without permission”
That is SO CRUEL. That’s DISGUSTING!

This is very disgusting, if they still do any of these things then they NEED to be shut down ASAP. This is DISGUSTING! This is an OUTRAGE! Why is there not a huge public outcry about this voile extremely cruel inhumane torture!

JRC then and now. Beyond cruel treatment.

Excerpt from The New York Times June 23, 1997 printed from microfiche at the Pawtucket RI library page B4 (first column) says:
    Although scratching was his primary behavioral problem, he was eventually shocked for 72 actions. These included things B.R.I. felt were part of a “chain” of self-abuse: hiding parts of his body so he could scratch undetected, crossing his legs. But he was also shocked for things more on the order of cantankerous behavior: non-compliance of any sort, yelling, cursing.
    He has also been incontinent. At night, an aid woke him every two hours to usher him to the bathroom. If he soiled his bed he would be shocked as he slept. He would be shocked for “tensing up” while asleep. The interrupted nights left him drowsy, but if he dozed during the day, he would be shocked.

The Judge Rotenberg Center (JRC) used to be named The Behavior Research Institute (BRI). This article was back when the original director Matthew Israel was running it.

What does the new director Glenda Crooks say about shocking students for non aggressive behavior? Excerpt from my JRC report:
On our trip to JRC I mentioned to Glenda that on Jennifer’s behavior sheet that she would be shocked for getting out of bed without permission. Glenda did not deny it or even say that they have stopped the practice, instead she justified this by saying that shocks are sometimes used on behaviors that are a “precursor” to abusive behavior.

Glenda Crooks seems to me at least less cruel then her predecessor Mathew Isreal because she stopped some very cruel practices that went on there. (See my JRC report under “Some questions I put together”.)

See:
Varies Verified Info and Sources About JRC
Do they still give painful shocks for behaviors that are not aggressive?
My JRC report

 

Please save the internet

Vote is on December 14, 2017
THE FREEDOM AND LIBERTY OF THIS COUNTRY IS AT STEAK, IT’S UP TO YOU!

Basically what the end of net neutrality means, is that if your ISP (internet company) doesn’t like a site your trying to access (like Netflix because it’s to much competition) they can block them or slow down your connection to them. If you don’t think this could happen, well it already has. COMCAST was getting away with doing this for a while until they were found out. We need to keep laws in place to stop ISPs from doing this.

Please go to gofccyourself.com click +Express and comment to the FCC you want Net Neutrality laws in Title II.

Also contact congress by going here https://www.battleforthenet.com/

You can also sign the petition at: https://www.change.org/p/save-net-neutrality-netneutrality/w

#netneutrality

An alternative to JRC and Skin Shocks that works

So many times it’s all to easy to post problems without solutions. Brian Iwata who invented the shock device JRC’s shock device was based on has successfully phased out his device the SIBIS.

The following is from:
The Washington Post – An electric shock therapy stops self-harm among the autistic, but at what cost?

Brian Iwata, a professor of psychology and psychiatry at the University of Florida who developed an earlier version of the GED, called the self-injurious behavior inhibiting system, or SIBIS, says it’s time to phase it out.

The SIBIS is no longer manufactured, Iwata says: “We found other ways to deal with the problem.”

Iwata says he’s treated hundreds of self-injurious individuals at the Kennedy Krieger Institute at Johns Hopkins Children’s Center and the University of Florida, including “the most difficult cases there were to see.” And he’s had success with milder forms of punishment, from timeouts to restraints, as well as rewards.

“It might take longer,” he says. “If we shocked everyone who came in the door, we could probably do things quickly.” But “most professionals in the field do not regard shock as an acceptable form of treatment for problem behavior.”